68 Wn.2d 415, WILLIAM E. NEAL et al., Respondents, v. RODERICK GREEN et at., Appellants

[No. 38782. Department Two.      Supreme Court      April 14, 1966.]

WILLIAM E. NEAL et al., Respondents, v. RODERICK GREEN
                     et at., Appellants.«*»

[1] Appeal and Error - Record on Appeal - Timely Filing - Jurisdiction. Timely filing of a transcript and statement of facts is not a jurisdictional prerequisite to appellate review.

[2] Same - Counsel's Failure to Observe Rules - Effect - Terms. Inasmuch as the Supreme Court is hesitant to punish litigants for neglect of their counsel, a motion to dismiss because of the appellants' failure to timely file the appeal bond, transcript, and statement of facts was denied, there being no prejudice to the respondents, upon the condition that the appellants file their opening brief within 30 days; and for failure to observe the Rules on Appeal, terms were imposed upon appellants' counsel to be paid to respondents' counsel as attorney's fees.

Motion filed in the Supreme Court February 25, 1966, to dismiss an appeal. Denied conditionally.

Orvin H. Messegee, for appellants.

Bogle, Gates, Dohrin, Wakefield & Long and Orlo B. Kellogg, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. -

Respondents have moved to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution and for failure to comply with the requirements pertaining to timely filing of the appeal bond. transcript and statement of facts.


«*» Reported in 413 P.2d 339.

 416    STATE v. BAXTER           [68 Wn.2d

We find no prejudice to respondents resulting from the late filing of the appeal bond.

[1, 2] Although we find that the transcript and statement of facts were filed late, this court is hesitant to punish litigants for neglect of their counsel. Timely filing of a transcript and statement of facts is not a jurisdictional prerequisite to review. Beagle v. Beagle, 55 Wn.2d 908, 349 P.2d 241 (1960).

In the circumstances of this case, in the exercise of our discretion, we conditionally deny the motion providing appellants file their opening brief within 30 days from the date of this decision. Pursuant to Rule on Appeal 7, RCW vol. 0, we impose upon appellants' counsel, for failure to observe the Rules on Appeal, terms of one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00) to be paid to respondents' counsel as attorney's fees. Beagle v. Beagle, supra.

It is so ordered.