63 Wn.2d 833, In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceedings Against WILLIAM R. WALLIS, an Attorney at Law

[No. C.D. 3765. En Banc.      Supreme Court      February 20, 1964.]

In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceedings Against
           WILLIAM R. WALLIS, an Attorney at Law.«*»

[1] Attorney and Client - Office of Attorney - Suspension and Disbarment - Grounds. Grand larceny is a felony involving moral turpitude within the meaning of Rule for Discipline of Attorneys 1, which provides for the disbarment of an attorney convicted of such a felony.

Proceedings filed in the Supreme Court July 19, 1963, for the discipline of an attorney. Judgment of disbarment.

T. M. Royce, for Board of Governors.

OTT, C. J. -

January 15, 1962, William R. Wallis, an attorney admitted to practice law in the state of Washington, was charged in the Superior Court for Lewis County with three counts of grand larceny by embezzlement, and, on March 13, 1962, he was charged with another count of grand larceny by embezzlement.

December 24, 1962, he pleaded guilty to the charges as alleged in both informations and was sentenced to the Washington State Penitentiary for not more than 15 years. He is presently serving the sentence imposed.

Disciplinary proceedings were instituted against William R. Wallis, as provided by the Rules for.Discipline of Attorneys. Wallis made no appearance. The hearing panel entered findings of fact, and recommended that William R. Wallis be disbarred. The Board of Governors reviewed the proceedings and concurred in the recommendation of the hearing panel.

[1] Rules for Discipline of Attorneys provide that disbarment may follow when an attorney is convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude. Rule for Discipline of Attorneys 1. The crime of grand larceny is a felony and involves moral turpitude. In re Dalton, 60 Wn. (2d) 726, 375


* Reported in 389 P. (2d) 421.

[1] See Ann. 32 A.L.R. 1069; Am. Jur. (2d), Attorneys at Law § 50.

 834    INVESTMENT SER. CO. v. LaLONDE [63 Wn. (2d)

P. (2d) 258 (1962); In re Timothy, 58 Wn. (2d) 153, 361 P. (2d) 642 (1961).

We adopt the recommendation of the hearing panel and the Board of Governors of the Washington State Bar Association.

It is, therefore, ordered that respondent, William R. Wallis, be, and he hereby is, disbarred from the practice of law in the state of Washington, and that his name be struck from the roll of attorneys.
ALL CONCUR.