[No. 29153. En Banc. Supreme Court April 24, 1944.]

RAYMOND W. CLIFFORD et al., Respondents, v. THE STATE OF

WASHINGTON, Appellant.«1»

«1» Reported in 148 P. (2d) 302.

[3] See 106 A. L. R. 955; 18 Am. Jur. 936

528 CLIFFORD v. STATE. [20 Wn. (2d)

ROBINSON, JEFFERS, and MALLERY, JJ., dissent.

The Attorney General and Harold A. Pebbles, Assistant, for appellant.

MacBride & Williams, for respondents.

Apr. 1944] CLIFFORD v. STATE. 529

530 CLIFFORD v. STATE. [20 Wn. (2d)

Apr. 1944] CLIFFORD v. STATE. 531

532 CLIFFORD v. STATE. [20 Wn. (2d)

Bancroft's Code Practice and Remedies, Vol. 2, § 1615, p. 2081-2082.

Apr. 1944] CLIFFORD v. STATE. 533

534 CLIFFORD v. STATE. [20 Wn. (2d)

Apr. 1944] CLIFFORD v. STATE. 535

536 CLIFFORD v. STATE. [20 Wn. (2d)

SIMPSON, C. J., BEALS, STEINERT, BLAKE, and GRADY, JJ., concur.

Apr. 1944] CLIFFORD v. STATE. 537

reflects the testimony of the respondents' witnesses only.

538 CLIFFORD v. STATE. [20 Wn. (2d)

Apr. 1944] CLIFFORD v. STATE. 539

540 CLIFFORD v. STATE. [20 Wn. (2d)

Apr. 1944] CLIFFORD v. STATE. 541

542 CLIFFORD v. STATE. [20 Wn. (2d)

Apr. 1944] CLIFFORD v. STATE. 543

544 CLIFFORD v. STATE. [20 Wn. (2d)

Apr. 1944] CLIFFORD v. STATE. 545

546 CLIFFORD v. STATE. [20 Wn. (2d)

Subsequently, he said: "Not until 1942."

Apr. 1944] CLIFFORD v. STATE. 547

with the property, then, was more or less of a general nature? A. Yes." (Italics mine.)

Witness C testified, in part, as follows:

548 CLIFFORD v. STATE. [20 Wn. (2d)

that the property was in the same state of development in 1938 that it had been in 1929.

Apr. 1944] CLIFFORD v. STATE. 549

550 CLIFFORD v. STATE. [20 Wn. (2d)