95 Wn.2d 962, GREEN RIVER COLLEGE v. HEP BOARD

CITE:          95 Wn.2d 962, 633 P.2d 1324

               GREEN RIVER COLLEGE v. HEP BOARD

CAUSE NUMBER: 46939-3

FILE DATE:     August 27, 1981

CASE TITLE: Green River Community College, et al, Respondents,
               v.
               Higher Education Personnel Board, et al,
               Petitioners.

NAMES OF CONCURRING OR DISSENTING JUDGES:

Brachtenbach, C.J., and Stafford and Hicks, JJ., dissent by separate opinion.

NATURE OF ACTION: Reconsideration of a decision reported at 95 Wn.2d 108, which held that the Higher Education Personnel Board had certain arbitration authority.

Supreme Court: The court modifies certain language in its prior opinion but adheres to its decision REVERSING the Court of Appeals.

COUNSEL:      KENNETH O. EIKENBERRY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, and CLIFFORD D. FOSTER, ASSISTANT, for petitioner Higher Education Personnel Board.

DEAN A. FLOYD and AUDREY B. EIDE, for petitioners Washington Federation of State Employees, et al.

KENNETH O. EIKENBERRY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, RICHARD M. MONTECUCCO, SENIOR ASSISTANT, and DAVID A. SARACENO and STUART ALLEN, ASSISTANTS, for respondents.

AUTHOR OF MAJORITY OPINION: Williams, J. -

MAJORITY OPINION: An opinion in this case was reported in GREEN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE v. HIGHER EDUC. PERSONNEL BD., 95 Wn.2d 108, 622 P.2d 826 (1980). We granted reconsideration, and now adhere to our prior opinion, except that the final sentence of footnote 1 in that opinion is stricken.

CONCURRING JUDGES: Rosellini, Utter, Dolliver, Dore, and Dimmick, JJ., concur.

AUTHOR OF DISSENTING OPINION: Brachtenbach, C.J. (dissenting) -

DISSENTING OPINION: I dissent for the reasons stated in the original case reported at 95 Wn.2d 108, 121, 622 P.2d 826 (1980).

CONCURRING JUDGES: Stafford and Hicks, JJ., concur with Brachtenbach, C.J.

POST-OPINION INFORMATION: